Hello guys...would anyone happen to know if the 'Unlicensed' type of license allows everyone to perform operations and transfers on the token compiled with that license? Or does the license only apply to the written but uncompiled code? Giving the written code, does it create the possibility of being attacked or having modifications made to my compiled token?

I mean....if I compile and create a token with that license (unlicense) and some functions...when it become public, could someone use it as he wants, transferring (for example) tokens due to the unlicense license? or the license impacts only the source code?

ok, so there is no risk to lose tokens or the compiled smart contract

sorry...stupid question but I am beginner :(

however...thank you

by license no ofc

unlicensed means it's not open-source

and you can get into trouble if you use it for personal/commercial purpose (only if caught that is)

mm no
it is the opposite

Huh?

This is free and unencumbered software released into the public domain.

Anyone is free to copy, modify, publish, use, compile, sell, or distribute this software, either in source code form or as a compiled binary, for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial, and by any means.

Unlicensed was for non open-source, all others are open-source licenses, mit, gpl etc

it can be both

I am not understadnign what you want to say

What is the Unlicense? The Unlicense is a template for disclaiming copyright monopoly interest in software you've written; in other words, it is a template for dedicating your software to the public domain. It combines a copyright waiver patterned after the very successful public domain SQLite project with the no-warranty statement from the widely-used MIT/X11 license.

Unlicensed and Unlicense different?

I don't think so

Im now confused

SPDX is SPDX

and there is only Unlicense there

https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/12410/is-there-a-difference-between-unlicense-org-and-spdx-unlicensed

ahh okok

I see

my bad didn't know

yes copyright right?

I won't say copyright

not mentioned? I mean does it mean license not mentioned

you must pay for copyright

for somethink like copyright check what Uniswap did for V3

they're using unlicensed

where

Ok what I should use? it will be a commercial use to get funds for a project...

wait lemme check again, not sure

// SPDX-License-Identifier: BUSL-1.1

https://support.uniswap.org/hc/en-us/articles/14569783029645-Uniswap-v3-Licensing-

your choice

oh yes this

ok so no problems if I will use unlicense for a commercial use?!

if you don't wanna mention what licence it is under then unlicensed I think

Unlicense if open-source

MIT is fine too

ok yes....I want everyone to see the code...

they will see anyway

the standard ❤️... code should be open-source 😂 so I can copy later

you only need to verify it

is it difficult?

no

google is your friend

if you're using imports then to Verify also search the topic of flattened contracts

No more google just use chatgpt 😂

one of the most useless things i've ever read lol

imagine suing someone because he copied a verified smart contract

are we in that time yet? :o

just an assumption

No one cares about this in solidity

Good luck teaching judges what smart contracts are