Hello guys, I dont know if you can help me, but I need an opinion/suggestion. I created smart contract for staking, but I have concerns that maybe my function distributeRewards() will ran out of gas (gas cap reach) if there will be a lot of users (maybe more than 100?) There is a loop. You think that my concerns are legit? Can this be done in any other way?

@FreezyDev has 15+ years of expiriance

as he say

maybe he is so smart so he can help

or he is just talk

ok he is just talk

I hope he is the man :D

he is not kek

he is kek

The fact that you don't get irony is alarming

this is the point

the jew allowed

to say this

ok ok

If you need dev use job channel

i dont need a dev

Ok

we have a legend

then that's all

let's speak about solidity please

cool

http://detecthoneypot.com/
https://honeypot.is/

those 2 chekrs

sometimes they show diffrent numbers

how can we make accurate tax calc?

First find a token

0x980e9635eefc19a067c7d68ef8337b040b414a38

you say 9 / 9

this one 9 /10

this one 9 /10

who is right?

you or them?

its important cause we have a tax defend, so if its miss by one precent its majour..,.

the oly way to know is to try manual

explain the diffrence

why you say 9 they say 10

that all i wnnt to know

looks it is 9%

I don't know how those work
Mine literally simulate a real trade

ok

anothe one

0x7ed7eaa3108Eac4De127cA550A9c5E423AC92a75

you say 0/ 0

other say this.

rugged

fuck

it was quck

quick

rugged doesn't mean honeypot

yes i know

he say 0 fee

we spakeing on the fees mate

ok another one
0xC96c38a72C949211F0c45A9FEdB0125c616581Fe

you say

Buy fees:
27%
Sell fees:
27%

other say
Buy Tax:
21.0 %
Sell Tax:
27.2 %

6% deffrence

its majour.

your tax check miss somthing?

so which one is accurate?

this is my qestion/

how can we make an accurate one

cause i dont know, every one of this checkers is shit

poo say (Buy Tax: 9%, Sell Tax: 21%)

3 checkers 3 diffrent results

if we speak solidity lets speak.

@FreezyDev

I am checking

0xC96c38a72C949211F0c45A9FEdB0125c616581Fe

this doesn't give 27 and 27

they updated the fees I think

now its 22

yes they are updarting

they keep updating lol

we have a tax checker developer here

btw if you want to continue go to dm because we are spamming

people use it

but its not accurate

whats the point?

what spamming? talking about fee tax checkers you wrote that give diffrent numbers every click

yes but we are spamming too much
it is better to leave the chat clean

so with who we can speak about it?

and asking acause we need a good one in our platform mate

if not in solidity dev gorup>?

change the name

prove it

how https://tenderly.co/ can help?

need it for customers

not for my self

ask your dev

open it

go to simulation

and go on

https://docs.tenderly.co/

but you have built one

and im trying to debug it with you and see the pattern

ok boys

Are you kidding or what

stop here

ive said ok

no problem

nono

it is not needed

Respect the people who built what you are using for free, if it is shit build yours and stfu

Fuck off

https://blog.1inch.io/a-vulnerability-disclosed-in-profanity-an-ethereum-vanity-address-tool-68ed7455fc8c

Oh shit...

Time to say goodbye to my 0xdeadbeef

cast vanity joined the chat

bitquery?

learn how to get screenshots

1. learn how to get screenshot

2. show the error

Ok

Sorry telegram is not logged in my PC but I will do that.
Thank you

1

2

ok so
did you read the error?

here too

Just do what it said, encode your parameters

you can do this, keccak256(abi.encodePacked(block.difficulty, block.timestamp, player))

Thank you

Guys is there any concept of patenting for smart contracts?

Like, you build something unique and don't want others to copy

Also some sort of affirmation that you came up with the idea and built it first

I've seen the licensing model used by uni, but that's not exactly patenting is it?

I think you should check the sprx license identfiers maybe

but don't know if it is enough

So just using licenses is best way to go?

that's at least about a million times easier

Thanks bro
I'm following a tutorial the tutor did exactly what I did previously without any errors but my was giving me errors why did it happen that way?

maybe you should check version you are using and the one the tutor is using.

Oh..
Thanks man
The versions are actually different
Thanks for this information

Yes. Software license, declare it in the header. Ezpz.

?

Probably better way to generate vanity addresses

yea but didnt find anything under that keyword

It's part of Foundry

https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/cast/cast-wallet-vanity

thanks❤️❤️

Wintermute hacked for more then 160 millions of dollars!

Attackers address:

0xe74b28c2eAe8679e3cCc3a94d5d0dE83CCB84705

Hacker already put over $80m of usdt and usdc in curve https://etherscan.io/tx/0xd7bf7b67e0d0095b7eb1813a4a60c129b45694374bf996f9ecc249d07efbcd02 to avoid blacklisting them by Circle/Tether…

Tx hash:

0xe74b28c2eAe8679e3cCc3a94d5d0dE83CCB84705

They targeted this

They used an ancillary contract for doing the job:

etherscan.io/tokentxns?a=0x0248f752802b2cfb4373cc0c3bc3964429385c26

Probably the reason is in Profanity issue. More info to come, stay tuned!

Freezy shared a doc about this recently i think.

Extract from CIA Officer group