How do I know what and what not I can pass to contracts?
Oct 3, 2021, 8:45 AM
  Oct 3, 2021, 8:45 AM
  Address..
 Oct 3, 2021, 8:53 AM
  It's address variable
 But I have encountered many times in past
 This thing
 Passing any argument, to contact
 I don't know , if I'm messsing something, can't understand this
 Oct 3, 2021, 8:57 AM
  Function setKittyContractAddress(address
 Oct 3, 2021, 8:57 AM
  Yeah I know that
 But u can see that argument passed to a contract called 'kittyInterface'
 KittyInterface is a contract, How is it possible to pass argument to it?
 Oct 3, 2021, 9:05 AM
  You can't
 You are not passing argument to interface
 You are linking an interface to the address _address
 Oct 3, 2021, 9:14 AM
  Oh got it, so a contract can only be linked to a address right?
 Can u tell me, what _address will be here?
 Will it be kitty erc721 contract?
 Oct 3, 2021, 9:16 AM
  You are telling 'your contract' that another contract at address '_address' have functions which are defined in kittyinterface
 _address will be the contract's address which have implemented getKitty method
 Oct 3, 2021, 9:18 AM
  @grimreaper619 what does this green underlined line of code means?
 Declaring a variable a contract data type? π₯Ά
 Oct 3, 2021, 9:22 AM
  That is the "link"
 A reference to actual kitty contract
 The function below is the linking process
 Oct 3, 2021, 9:23 AM
  I still don't understand
 now confused on the things you mentioned above
 Oct 3, 2021, 9:25 AM
  For example, you have contract A
 There is a different contract B which have a function abcd()
 Contract B is deployed on address 0xb
 You want to call the function abcd() from contract A on contract B
 But contract A does not know where contract B is
 So we create a link
 By saying, 'contract B is deployed on address 0xb with functions  such as abcd() available'
 Oct 3, 2021, 9:28 AM
  Yes, those are available on Contract B's interface
 But I have written those in my my solidity file, by creating new contract called kitty interface, so I have 3 contracts now?
 I will interact with interface that is deployed on ethereum
 But why I have to write that interface code again, creating new contract?
 Oct 3, 2021, 9:30 AM
  Interface does not do anything on its own
 Interface basically says 'There is a function named abcd(), which takes these parameters and ouput this parameter'
 It does not know what happens inside abcd()
 Oct 3, 2021, 9:32 AM
  Can u paste any code snippet as well, so I can know what it will look like finally
 I think I am not interacting with actual crypto kitty contract, that's why I have to write crypto kitty interface in my contract
 Creating another copy on crypto kitty interface.
 Oct 3, 2021, 9:34 AM
  interface IWalletStore {
event OwnershipTransferred(
address indexed previousOwner,
address indexed newOwner
);
function isVerified(address) external view returns (bool);
function addUser(address _address) external returns (bool);
function getVerifiedUsers() external view returns (address[] memory);
}
 event OwnershipTransferred(
address indexed previousOwner,
address indexed newOwner
);
function isVerified(address) external view returns (bool);
function addUser(address _address) external returns (bool);
function getVerifiedUsers() external view returns (address[] memory);
}
This is an example interface
 As you can see, no function definitions
 It just says this function takes these parameters and returns this parameter
 Function definition will be on the actual implementation of this interface
 Oct 3, 2021, 9:35 AM
  yea, so let's say this is interface of contract B, the example you gave above
 So, If I want to access the function isVerified of contract B in contract A
 Then I will have to use this interface as well?
 And how will I use this interface for contract A
 Oct 3, 2021, 9:36 AM
  1) You should have contract B deployed separate
2) You should import this interface on contract A
3) Create a link to contract B like in the pic you shared
4) If you named that link as walletInterface for example, you can then call isVerified function from contract A like
walletInterface.isVerified(_address)
 2) You should import this interface on contract A
3) Create a link to contract B like in the pic you shared
4) If you named that link as walletInterface for example, you can then call isVerified function from contract A like
walletInterface.isVerified(_address)
_address here is just a random address, not contract address
 Oct 3, 2021, 9:40 AM
  ππ₯
 contract Ownable {
address private _owner;
event OwnershipTransferred(
address indexed previousOwner,
address indexed newOwner
);
constructor() internal {
_owner = msg.sender;
emit OwnershipTransferred(address(0), _owner);
}
 address private _owner;
event OwnershipTransferred(
address indexed previousOwner,
address indexed newOwner
);
constructor() internal {
_owner = msg.sender;
emit OwnershipTransferred(address(0), _owner);
}
Saw this ownable contract on openzappeline
 Why it says, ownership rights was earlier to address(0)?
 I agree that it has given to msg.sender now
 Oct 3, 2021, 10:15 AM
  Constructor is called on deployment so the owner is the one who's deploying it
 Oct 3, 2021, 10:16 AM
  Ohh that's understandable, but I saw emit event says previous owner was address(0)
 Oct 3, 2021, 10:19 AM
  Empty address = address(0)
 Oct 3, 2021, 10:23 AM
  Got it, it's like 0 for int data type
 Oct 3, 2021, 10:26 AM
  @JoshHale Read from here
 Oct 5, 2021, 6:19 PM
  .
 another is this one
 Where I am struggling to get it properly
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:16 AM
  It's just like int or string
 But with a lot more functuons
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:16 AM
  make sense
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:16 AM
  It's initiating a new type of kitty interface
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:16 AM
  like?
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:17 AM
  The functions you put in the original interface of kitty interface can be accessed like this
 Kitty contract. your function
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:17 AM
  wow nice
 what line of code inside function setkittycontract doing?
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:19 AM
  It can access all functions inside kitty contract
 I'll show you
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:20 AM
  But why passed an address as argument?
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:20 AM
  This is how you access different contract
 If you want to interact with uniswap you do this
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:21 AM
  So I have to paste code of uniswap interface first?
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:21 AM
  yes
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:22 AM
  and then copy contract address of core contract with functionallity I want
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:22 AM
  Yes
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:22 AM
  and the function I am accessting from uniswap contract, that function should be available in the interface I copy pasted
 without any implementation
 just refrence
 I don't understand reason of this
 why?
 If I am accessing original contract by it's deployed adress
 then it will give me access to all the functions
 why I need to copy paste interface again?
 ββββββββββββββββββββββββββ-
 asking 1 more question don't know if make sense
 There are events in ownable that shows ownership transfered from old Owner to new owner
 constructor() {
_transferOwnership(_msgSender());
}
 _transferOwnership(_msgSender());
}
and it does at deployment as well
 So is there any other early owner than deployer?
 Like when txn is  pending?
 What this event refer to as previous owner here?
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:43 AM
  No
 The owner is address (0)
 Oct 9, 2021, 7:49 AM
  Yes this, I want to know
 So owner is address 0 before msg.sender?
 address(0) is dead address right?
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:34 AM
  Yes
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:35 AM
  0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:35 AM
  Constructor is the first call on deployment
 Yes
 This is also an empty address
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:35 AM
  So when address 0 is owner?
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:35 AM
  If you put address some address;
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:35 AM
  before deployment?
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:35 AM
  If you deployed this
 Even if this is empty
 It will show address (0)
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:36 AM
  ohh
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:36 AM
  Yes
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:36 AM
  so address is address(0)
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:36 AM
  Empty address is address (0)
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:36 AM
  Hmm thanks
 one more doubt
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:37 AM
  ππ
 Sure
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:37 AM
  in ownable.sol
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:37 AM
  Yes
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:37 AM
  What's this address?
 _owner
 We have never assigned this to any hard coded address
 Or niether equal to msg.sender
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:38 AM
  Now this is address (0)
 The _owner is now msg.sender
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:40 AM
  wow thanks
 I was stuck here from sometime
 π
 Yeah now clear
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:41 AM
  ππ
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:41 AM
  We can use interface for abstract contract as well right?
 Oct 9, 2021, 8:42 AM
  Yes
 Abstract contract is a library which inherits another library
 π
 Oct 9, 2021, 10:12 AM
  Again found old statement
 so asked
 Oct 9, 2021, 10:12 AM
  π
 Alright the bot is up and running
 Oct 9, 2021, 10:30 AM
  why this error?
 I am able to import all other files, but can't do with safemath and ownable
 So, it's creating an instance of the kitty contract deployed?
 Why do we need to declare interface of the contract we want to use functions of, inside the contract we are working on?
 Let's say I'm working on contract A, and I want to access function abcd() of contract B
 I have address of contract b - 0xb
 as we can see on ether scan contract has interface functions available publicly for everyone
 So can't we just access them from there?
 βββββββββββββββββββββ
 @NeoMitashi Had some questions related to market cap
 Actually I don't have good understanding of it
 What happens when I suddenly double up the circulation supply? will market cap also double or market cap will remain same and price will go half down?
 Oct 12, 2021, 7:41 AM
  Exactly
 Oct 12, 2021, 7:55 AM
  Thanks
 @grimreaper619
 What will remain constant out of price, marketcap? as money invested in it same as earlier nothing flowing in it, but supply increasing
 What does it mean that Call() function forward all the gas from the sender address to receiver address?
 gas goes to miner not sender or receiver right?
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:15 AM
  Call is a lower level transaction
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:15 AM
  yeah this word also confusing
 low level transactions and functions
 What does it mean?
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:16 AM
  It means you can call other functions of contracts with hexadecimal values
 Without an interface
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:19 AM
  Is there any read on low level functions? heard this word many times
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:19 AM
  Yes on solidity docs
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:20 AM
  solidity docs tells call(), delegatecall, staticcall are low level function, didn't find any resources on what it means
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:21 AM
  It's actually just that you can call functions of other contacts without any 
Interface only with address
 Interface only with address
I don't remember were I've read it
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:23 AM
  So, where gas goes?
 It goes to miner? or receiver of call?
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:23 AM
  Miner
 Value goes to receiver
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:26 AM
  ok thanks
 @NeoMitashi
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:30 AM
  π
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:32 AM
  I am asking question bro
 π
 ??
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:37 AM
  Ohhπ
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:37 AM
  π₯²
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:37 AM
  Idk bsc scan needs all the code that we put into the contract
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:38 AM
  @NeoMitashi Do u know this?
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:39 AM
  Marketcap will double and price of token will half
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:40 AM
  If price halves surely marketcap stays the same?
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:46 AM
  It depends on the cause
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:46 AM
  lmao how? if supply doubled, market cap doubled, then token price will be 4X
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:47 AM
  It depends actually
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:47 AM
  msg.sender is always type of address payable?
 I am not getting this at all
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:48 AM
  Market cap is the amount of tokens people bought and are holding
 Msd.sender is not payable by default
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:48 AM
  So how to make it?
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:48 AM
  Payable (msg.sender)
 Oct 12, 2021, 10:49 AM
  oh, I tried address payable(msg.sender)
 Expected a state variable declaration. If you intended this as a fallback function or a function to handle plain ether transactions, use the "fallback" keyword or the "receive" keyword instead.
 Anyone faced this error?
 function() external payable {}
 What's wrong with this fallback function?
 Oct 12, 2021, 12:25 PM
  It's receive () external payable {} in newer version of solidity
 Oct 12, 2021, 12:25 PM
  from which version?
 Oct 12, 2021, 12:25 PM
  Idk
 Oct 12, 2021, 12:26 PM
  function owner() public view virtual returns (address) {
return _owner;
}
 return _owner;
}
This fucntion return _owner
 Oct 12, 2021, 12:27 PM
  Yea
 Oct 12, 2021, 12:27 PM
  address payable private _owner;
 which is payable
 address payable _owner = owner();
 Oct 12, 2021, 12:28 PM
  ?
 Oct 12, 2021, 12:28 PM
  this is giving error - Type address is not implicitly convertible to expected type address payable.
 Is this statement valid? as owner() returns a variable of address payable datatype
 Oct 12, 2021, 12:29 PM
  returns (payable address)
 Oct 12, 2021, 12:29 PM
  π₯΅
 I have updated a old version code I wrote to new one, you have helped a lot, learnt many things
 Thanks bro
 Oct 12, 2021, 12:31 PM
  ππ
 Oct 12, 2021, 12:33 PM
  It'll double ig
 Price is calculated for 1 token
 Then multiplied with supply
 So if you double supply, it would be doubled as well
 And you'll only get scammers for 50$ :)
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:26 PM
  I do not understand?
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:27 PM
  Good luck with 50$ smart contract probably you wouldn't neither be able to sell, or would be a copycat
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:27 PM
  hmm
 I won't do much, I already prepared the contract, more or less, but I needed to add a feature, I have a problem with that.
 That's why I said I have a $50 budget
 I can give more, but I think this is the most worth it.
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:29 PM
  Good luck finding a devππ
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:31 PM
  When we reach 100k holders VRF will need to select the winner based on x amount held in the walllet
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:32 PM
  may be look on fiver
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:32 PM
  Why not 1M?
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:36 PM
  hi guys can anyone assist?ππΏππΏππΏ  I tried to verify a smart contract on rinkeby testnet but I get an error like this:                                                                                               " Error! Unable to generate Contract ByteCode and ABI
Found the following ContractName(s) in source code : Address, Context, ERC165, ERC721, ERC721Enumerable, IERC165, IERC721, IERC721Enumerable, IERC721Metadata, IERC721Receiver, , Ownable, Strings
But we were unable to locate a matching bytecode (err_code_2)"
 Found the following ContractName(s) in source code : Address, Context, ERC165, ERC721, ERC721Enumerable, IERC165, IERC721, IERC721Enumerable, IERC721Metadata, IERC721Receiver, , Ownable, Strings
But we were unable to locate a matching bytecode (err_code_2)"
Oct 12, 2021, 1:37 PM
  How are u doing this?
 Use hardhat verification. It works well
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:38 PM
  i deployed through remix
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:38 PM
  Well if is a joke question haahaha otherwise 1M is way too far, token is new only 4 months old and we have around 15k holders atm so we thought 100k wouldn't be much
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:38 PM
  Oh than I canβt help. Sry
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:38 PM
  I think its to do with the bytecode? but i copied and pasted the correct bytecode
 thanks anyway now need to set up truffle or hard hat
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:39 PM
  In both itβs pretty easy. Gl ;)
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:40 PM
  Or there was a pretty easy workaround. Iterablemapping
 Oct 12, 2021, 1:40 PM
  Yeah the point that i was looking was for a not expensive option as paying 6k fees to keep trustless and transparency.  But since those are the only option i will have  a think about of course each of the options has pro and cons.. 
thanks anyway
 thanks anyway
Oct 12, 2021, 1:45 PM
  Yeah why not
 Timestamp is of type uint256
 That's what matters
 Oct 12, 2021, 2:44 PM
  ok
 Oct 12, 2021, 2:51 PM
  make sense, so market cap will remain same right?
 Oct 12, 2021, 3:16 PM
  No I said it'll double...
 Only my guess. Never tried
 Say you have 1000 token total supply and 100 token for liquidity with 100 BNB
 So 1 token = 1 bnb
 Market cap = 1000*1 bnb
 So if 1000 becomes 2000
 Logically it would be 2000 BNB right?
 Oct 12, 2021, 3:21 PM
  Yes, but the price change every transaction. Check the article on Medium about Uniswap pools
 Oct 12, 2021, 3:51 PM
  Well of course. People buy/sell it, pool changes
 I gave example based on initial settings
 Oct 12, 2021, 3:54 PM
  So yes, the first time, you decide K as constant, the pool will play around that ratio and won't break from it ever.
 Oct 12, 2021, 3:56 PM
  Everything make sense now, price will be constant , otherwise project will double supply and give holders bonus as double price π
 Marketcap is not a measure of how much funds project has in it right?
 I don't understand the connection between liqudity and market cap
 If liquidity is low then market cap moves faster, and if it's high then it moves slow and sometime liquidity is even more than market cap how?
 Oct 12, 2021, 4:13 PM
  liqudity is how much of asset is available on the markets (trading platforms, dexs, etc) market cap equates to = value of asset multipled by total number of assets
 Oct 12, 2021, 4:14 PM
  It's not a good measure to evaluate a asset, when if I put 1ETH liquidity then asset can move to millions of market cap If I put 100K in it
 Oct 12, 2021, 4:15 PM
  it measures how much all the tokens in circulation are worth.
Usually, marketcap is higher then the liquidity, but it counts less.
What matter, is the total $$ inside the liquidity pool. For example, GUH/Gravitoken forks, you should not care about marketcap but you should just care about liquidity funds.
Remember marketcap is total supply (- burn) * price of a single token.
 Usually, marketcap is higher then the liquidity, but it counts less.
What matter, is the total $$ inside the liquidity pool. For example, GUH/Gravitoken forks, you should not care about marketcap but you should just care about liquidity funds.
Remember marketcap is total supply (- burn) * price of a single token.
Oct 12, 2021, 4:15 PM
  so if there is 20m of meow token and that meow token worth 1 dollar but only 2m of them is on uniswap others are hold by whales as example. that mea liqudity is 2m on uniswap and market cap is 20m$
 Oct 12, 2021, 4:15 PM
  Market doesn't make any sense at all, only supply and price are real things, market cap is a larp.
 whale bought that much supply from AMM?
 And how liquidity is sometimes more than market cap?
 Oct 12, 2021, 4:18 PM
  i still need to understand how a marketcap/liq impact indicator can help in judging a coin, i've impelemented that kind of data in my scanner, but still don't know if it's useful or not π
 Oct 12, 2021, 4:18 PM
  That's not possible
 Oct 12, 2021, 4:19 PM
  itβs so important to understand that price doesnβt mean how valuable the asset it other than the  scarcity. real life example is the $yfi token price higher than BTC  that doesnβt mean that $yfi is valuable and people are buying it. on real life same goes to kuwaiti dinar worth more than 4 USD
 Oct 12, 2021, 4:20 PM
  Should I show you?
 I understand that
 Oct 12, 2021, 4:22 PM
  yep, i don't remember any coin with more liquidity then mcap :o
 Oct 12, 2021, 4:22 PM
  creator can mint tokens without the need of βtradingβ with others his hard earned eth
 Oct 12, 2021, 4:22 PM
  I got it
 For example if 60% of the supply is in the pool then same amount of ETH is also in the pool, so if for the rest 40% market cap will always be lower
 If 60% of the total supply is in the liq pool there must be an equal amount of ETH as well. So market cap then ends up being lower than the amount of liq
 Oct 12, 2021, 4:40 PM
  Yeah
 Oct 12, 2021, 4:43 PM
  I gave an example, can't find real example now, but it's very likely possible
 Oct 12, 2021, 4:53 PM
  do you know how marketcap is calculated?
 Oct 12, 2021, 5:03 PM
  Price * circulating supply
 Oct 12, 2021, 5:20 PM
  mc = price multiplied by supply
swap price = ratio of token0 and token1 in LP (minus lp fee / spread)
 swap price = ratio of token0 and token1 in LP (minus lp fee / spread)
Oct 12, 2021, 5:20 PM
  I know this.
 Oct 12, 2021, 5:21 PM
  word
 Oct 12, 2021, 5:21 PM
  I was trying to figure things like market cap can move too fast or too slow even If I put same money into it
 So we can't major money putted into it just from market cap, like if market cap is 100M, then it doesn't mean project has 100M in it
 Oct 12, 2021, 5:22 PM
  thats from a large percentage of tokens outside of liquidity (i put $10 and 10 tokens in liq, and own 1 million token, then put $10 more in by buying it, and now market cap is doubled* (not really) with only 10 bucks)
mc $1m
then after purchase
mc $2m (basically)
 mc $1m
then after purchase
mc $2m (basically)
Oct 12, 2021, 5:23 PM
  Haha $10 made me millionaireπ
, Thanks got it
 Oct 12, 2021, 5:26 PM
  mc and TVL may are good metrics considering above
 Oct 12, 2021, 5:27 PM
  TVL is a really good measure for sure and Liquidity as well, But market cap I won't consider
 Like $10 made it 2M from 1M haha
 There is a high market cap proejct doing this
 Oct 12, 2021, 5:29 PM
  but by looking at the TVL u can see the MC is inaccurate (or accurate*)
 Oct 12, 2021, 5:29 PM
  They are controlling liquidity and sending it to 200-300X that's joke lol
 Yeah, it's the point, thanks
 I also check for TVL/MC while researching on projects
 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000dEaD
 What is this address?
 I can use 0 address in place of this?
 0 address, and this one
 This is called dead address right?
 Oct 12, 2021, 6:06 PM
  Any graphic designers here? I need a logo made please
 Oct 12, 2021, 7:02 PM
  If you look at the usd value of the token and the liquidity is token/bnb then price goes up
 If there are multiple pairs and not only bnb/token then... Arbitrage
 Oct 12, 2021, 7:08 PM
  Market cap would be used to check how much money is needed to enter the asset considering how much you put in. If you put in $1k into btc at $50k, what would the marketcap need to hit for it reach $100k for you to double your money. How much money needs to enter btc?
TVL is only useful for DeFi projects when considering farming or staking, not with normal ERC20 trading
 TVL is only useful for DeFi projects when considering farming or staking, not with normal ERC20 trading
Depending on your investment strategy, liquidity beats TVL and MC. Long term investing should be more focused on fundamental analysis
 Oct 12, 2021, 7:18 PM
  Thanks
 Oct 12, 2021, 7:20 PM
  Yw
 But I am not saying I am pro pinksale / against dxsale, I personally dislike them both for their lack of transparency lol
 Oct 12, 2021, 9:14 PM
  