I've transferred from owner wallet A to wallet B, from wallet B to wallet C, no fees are getting applied to any transferred tokens between wallets in testnet.

But all fees are set, there's no function to limit fees, only wallet excluded from fees is owner and marketing wallet.

https://bscscan.com/token/0x7B5B3BC6890c1dE78FeDE739C1b02D2e51B1b58c

This is contract I've forked into test net.

First time playing with one of these earn token contracts.

Makes no sense to me why fees wouldn't be applied.

There is something fucking around with the testnet router, but fees should be deducted still

Try sending tokens with a different account to owner. Also have you added testnet router address? Some contracts compile with mainnet router most don’t though.

I've done that. I've sent from owner to another wallet, and from that wallet to another and back to owner, none work.
Also, yeah I changed the pancakeswap router to testnet router...

Maybe I'm using the wrong router, there's two testnet routers right ?

Which testnet router is v2

I can manually change the router I'm pretty sure after it launches, are you saying even if I had testnet router in the code, it may have changed it to main net?
How's that even possible.

No I meant if you forked a mainnet contract you may of left mainnet router in there. Most cases it will throw a gas problem

Try excluding a wallet from fees

And then switch it back

Other than that I’m not sure sorry bro

Maybe it only works with liquidity fee but I’m on phone so not sure

If one wallet is connected to another wallet, would the connected wallet be tax free as well?

You know how you can have multiple wallets under one account in metamask.

Shouldn’t be an issue

Actually it is, because I just created some fresh wallets and now the fees work, very strange..... I wonder why it's making wallet addresses connected to my main wallet exempt from fees...

Hey, if say the owner wallet is exempt from fees and you send from owner wallet to another wallet on your list of wallets, the fees shouldn't be applied right.

Owner wallet is A.
Sent from owner wallet A to wallet B on the same metamask account.

Sent from wallet B to a new metamask account wallet C... which is not connected to wallets A and B...

The fee was not applied when sending from wallet B to wallet C or from wallet C to wallet B...

So I made another wallet on the second account connected to wallet C, wallet D.

Sent from wallet C to wallet D and now the fees are applied.

This makes no sense if only wallet A the owner of contract is suppose to be exempt from fees.

Why is any wallet connected to wallet A under the metamask account also exempt from fees?

Is this a keyring issue?

I think somehow the keyring for metamask is making all wallets connected to wallet A exempt from fees.

I was able to transfer between accounts and the fees worked, but after that first transfer I am now getting these errors with every transfer between wallets which aren't exempt from fees.

🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

I've increased gas limit significantly as well, and gwei, same issue unresolved.

Any idea why this error occurring?

Not sure what you mean Ser

Disable swap and liquify, if u have that function

Its likely triggered by Swap/SwapAndLiquidify, the contract cant execute that function for some reason

Cheers I'll have a look later

I'll take a look.

Had the same issues

Did you find a solution?

There's no ability to turn this off however.

Yeah turning it off works. It triggers because There is an error in your contract when taking fees

Or always use separate wallets for everything 😅

You could reduce the allowance 😘

you can't

when they have your sig

its done off chain

no tx

they'll store your sig

until they plan to rug

But they didnt steal sig, only they asked you to approve spending your BNB on your behalf

also, metamask has big red text that says that if you sign this they'll have full control over your wallet

no, that would need a transaction

on chain

they did it off chain

Wierd then

https://docs.metamask.io/guide/signing-data.html

In particular, the method eth_sign is an open-ended signing method that allows signing an arbitrary hash, which means it can be used to sign transactions, or any other data, making it a dangerous phishing risk.

TLDR; with sigs

Interesting didnt know they were that clever on it

that's werid af, maybe theyu are all connected to remiix

do u guys use testnet on bsc or rinkeby etc? Smart chain testnet wont let me add liquidity so i usually use uniswap

I use this website
https://pancake.kiemtienonline360.com/#/swap


Have to use this as router

https://testnet.bscscan.com/address/0x9Ac64Cc6e4415144C455BD8E4837Fea55603e5c3

my fuckin ggggg

Lel wanna do me a favour now ?

ok

I need a contract that has
Auto LP, burn wallet 0x0000... and a marketing fee.

:3

hm

I can do a fork, just need to find a contract that actually works.

i'll have a look

I found wife token, but their LP isn't sent to a dead wallet and I don't like that shit, screams rug to me.

And I want my investors to feel safu

by auto LP do u mean each buy and sell will go 2 liquidity (%)

Correct

And sent to a dead address.

ok

idk about the dead address

D;
I've literally been looking for like a whole week.

not sure why u would want a deaad address, not many with that feature

I can't believe it's not a common contract.

nah people want that moneyyy

me the same 😅

Because LP being sent to dead address is unruggable

just lock that shi

or send LP to a burn address and should be fine when AUTO LO

lp

Could just burn the auto LP once every 24 hours I guess, but that's tedious.

I am sure a contract must exist with LP being sent to dead, a marketing fee + burn..

I swear it's because LP being sent to dead is essentially a burn in itself, so people just stopped doing it.

If you lock the initial Liquidity up, does the automatic LP being sent to that address also get locked up?

Why not just lock it for 1 year? Otherwise its quite straightforward to just set the dead addres as receiver of future LP tokens

Have you included any odd functions, dependencies or conditionals in the S&L function?

THanks.. troubleshooting :p

😅😅

Yeah I just had a bunch of people DM me telling me to lock it for a year

I might just do that.