Guys an address sent bnb manually to the liquidity pool before the add of liquidity and now it gives problems trying to add liquidity, is there a way to fix this?

Now there's 0 token and x bnb

Is there a way to fix the ratio back to 0 on the pair?

wtf I hope this is not a way to change the rate. What happens if someone send more tokens?

It is...

😳

not here

check group in bio

Sent y amount of tokens and call sync() on pair

I did

Or better, simply call skim()

I mean he did and then I did to make the ratio good

He also called sync

Aah then skim won't work

Yeah

Then send tokens, call mint and remove liquidity

why a token should have changeble name and symbol?😅

a portion of the liquidity would go to pancake as fees locking me out of the lp😅

I had someone I know that did that

Yeah I forgot that😅. So no, its not possible to reset the pair

You can adjust the k, but no reset once it is initialised

how?

calling mint?

Sending x tokens and y bnb to pair, then calling sync()

I did that

now the ratio is good

It will force sync the ratio with current balance

so in thiw way anyone can change a ratio?
or only the owner?

yeah, problem is that once you mint lp tokens for the first time it starts taking fees on each minting of lp tokens

so even if it successfully adds all the liquidity on dxsale a big portion of it will go to pancake as fees

Anyone with token and BNB

anyone guys...

be careful

shit ahah

first time I experienced this

https://bscscan.com/address/0x24d86dc4e75979e9b57861b7a0944cdf38d73de0 this is the address that sent bnb to the pair

It was fairly common on ether, tokens with pre created pair and no liquidity

he is poor ahah

yeah ahahah

yeah it's incredible how easy it is :/

and how fucking damage it brings ahah

It doesn't do any real damage because you can always call sync anytime you want

anyone can

man I explained I guess

sorry but this can't be used for bad behaviour?

Hence, decentralised 🙂

now there is correct ratio but it still wouldn't work

yeah man don't treat me like an idiot lmao

Haha no, not at all. Just pointing out any damage done by liquidity ratio manipulation can easily be bypassed

this

.

What do you mean a big portion goes to pancake as fees?

Big portion of what? Trading fee?

you know everytime you add liquidity and it's not the first add a portion of the lp tokens go to https://bscscan.com/address/0x07d80ae6f36a5e08dca74ce884a24d39db9934ed ?

sure I'd say

this is pancake fees of v2 right?

Yes

it scared a lot of people

nope sorry
I am not good with web3

That's the feeto address of pancake right? As far as I know, its negligible compared to the trading fee you get as a real lp holder

Aah I understand your concern. If the K is manipulated to a higher value before liquidity addition from dxsale, a significantly higher amount will go to pancake feeTo. That, also can be fixed by syncing before dxsale adds its liquidity

Man this is the transaction with which I told the guy to try adding liquidity from the finalize, after manually setting the correct ratio, you can see where it failed and I think it can't be solved, now the sale is canceled but idk, https://bscscan.com/tx/0x8a249c9910d9c928124e9453e8b6226e17cbc7d957e1091c17743f0faefec73d this is what happened, do you think it could have gone differently?

This could've been avoided if sync() was called before dxsales liquidity addition. Before that, you have to adjust the ratio by sending appropriate amount of token as well

But yeah, nobody checks pair contract if it is already synced before adding liquidity🙃

man it was

check the transactions

we sent tokens and then called sync

Can you send that pair contract or token contracts add

this is the pair https://bscscan.com/address/0x406be9078687cf6f64a58086cf27ffbd02d9f01b

How come this is for adding liquidity? I don't know how dxsale adds liquidity, but the value is 0, which means they are adding liquidity with 0 bnb? It doesn't make any sense...

I didn't udnerstand
dxSale added already liquidity or not?

This is the finalize function of dxsale, which idk what it does as code is not verified but at the end you can check also on tenderly that it adds addliquidity on pancake

Nope, dxsale should have added liquidity but since someone manually sent bnb to the pair it ended screwing up everything

okok

well I thought that dxSale contracts used a proxy lol

Insufficient A amount, which is thrown when token A amount is insufficient while adding liquidity to an existing pool. Token A, which in this case is WBNB should also be transferred in the transaction as BNB. But the value of that transaction is 0, which will obviously result in fail. Maybe dxsale doesn't add liquidity straightforward

me too tbh lol

idk, I can't know how dxsale does what it does, can only guess it

this is where it failed

Interesting how people trust a platform which runs solely on unverified contracts

yeah...

Couldn't agree more

and asks a lot of money/ tokens ahah

what is this magic tool ahah

This must be inside addLiquidity on router contract? And that amountAMin would be the amount of token A

I never recommend that and I'd rather code a contract to handle that but apes like dxsale and clients don't care about such details

yes

amountAmin is set to 239997600000000000172800

Telegram should have wei to ether converter

I guess a rounding error with floating points screwed the situation

just count 18 digits

Just human eyes rolls after 10 to 12 digits 😂😂

usually I count with ,

That's.... A lot of BNB🙃

which tool is it?

tenderly man, sorry you found about this now ahahah

ahah I swear first time I heard about it

yes

https://tenderly.co/

everyday we learn new things😁

Hey everyone how do you handle unknown DMs

About trading, tokens, investment in blockchain and crap

ignore and signal as spam

If you are going to pitch about some trade company or something , we can end this conversation in no time

I usually send this first

If they are pissed, they are one of them. 😂😂

something like this

That's a lot to digest.

But I didn't get the logic why they are doing this.

Damn son😅

you had a rough week man? ahahah

not here please

Block and report, simple as

yes you gace 4 arguments

ussually
_transfer function is
_transfer(sender, recipient, amount)

Ah makes sense

Thanks it compiled now

Off topic but do you guys think btc is gonna break out finally this time

not here please

My bad

please check group in bio

Lol as soon as someone mentions money our bot davinci shows up

Let's try this

Looking for a developer with 20 years of experience on solidity, will pay very well

Apparently he doesn't like my proposal

Lol

Deleted the message

Probably now he will change name

what?

uh😅

for jobs offers please check group in bio

i did thanks

😜😜

please check this

FortuneCookie maybe

returns(uint256 rAMount, uint256 rTransferAmount...)

ok. thanks let me try that

nono

I mean in returns

ok .. let me try

you mean like this right

function _getValues(uint256 tAmount) private view returns (uint256 rAmount, uint256 rTransferAmount, uint256 rFee, uint256 tTransferAmount, uint256 tFee, uint256 tLiquidity,uint256 tLottery, uint256 tGrowth) {
(uint256 tTransferAmount, uint256 tFee, uint256 tLiquidity, uint256 tLottery, uint256 tGrowth) = _getTValues(tAmount);
(uint256 rAmount, uint256 rTransferAmount, uint256 rFee) = _getRValues(tAmount, tFee, tLiquidity, tLottery, tGrowth, _getRate());
return (rAmount, rTransferAmount, rFee, tTransferAmount, tFee, tLiquidity, tLottery, tGrowth);
}

it didnt work

yes but then you don't have to redefine

remove uint256 from the others

ok.. let me try

you mean like this right

function _getValues(uint256 tAmount) private view returns (uint256 rAmount, uint256 rTransferAmount, uint256 rFee, uint256 tTransferAmount, uint256 tFee, uint256 tLiquidity,uint256 tLottery, uint256 tGrowth) {
(tTransferAmount, tFee, tLiquidity, tLottery, tGrowth) = _getTValues(tAmount);
(rAmount, rTransferAmount, rFee) = _getRValues(tAmount, tFee, tLiquidity, tLottery, tGrowth, _getRate());
return (rAmount, rTransferAmount, rFee, tTransferAmount, tFee, tLiquidity, tLottery, tGrowth);
}

it didnt work

ok. i will try this one

this worked, and then the next function triggered stack too deep error

function _getTValues(uint256 tAmount) private view returns (uint256, uint256, uint256, uint256, uint256) {
uint256 tFee = calculateTaxFee(tAmount);
uint256 tLiquidity = calculateLiquidityFee(tAmount);
uint256 tLottery = calculateLotteryFee(tAmount);
uint256 tGrowth = calculateGrowthFee(tAmount);
uint256 tTransferAmount = tAmount.sub(tFee).sub(tLiquidity).sub(tLottery).sub(tGrowth);
return (tTransferAmount, tFee, tLiquidity, tLottery, tGrowth);
}

this one

do the same

function _getTValues(uint256 tAmount) private view returns (uint256 tFee, uint256 tLiquidity, uint256 tLottery, uint256 tGrowth, uint256 tTransferAmount) {
tFee = calculateTaxFee(tAmount);
tLiquidity = calculateLiquidityFee(tAmount);
tLottery = calculateLotteryFee(tAmount);
tGrowth = calculateGrowthFee(tAmount);
tTransferAmount = tAmount.sub(tFee).sub(tLiquidity).sub(tLottery).sub(tGrowth);
return (tTransferAmount, tFee, tLiquidity, tLottery, tGrowth);
}

ok ..let me try

thank you so much it worked

😁😁

you are a genius

ahah no bro

I just had the same problem

that's cool bro,

can yoi give more details

and you are on bsc mainnet right?

then use testnet one

0x9Ac64Cc6e4415144C455BD8E4837Fea55603e5c3

and use this to test
https://pancake.kiemtienonline360.com/#/swap

It worked. Thank you. Sorry, I'm a newb lol

np I'm a noob too o/

Whats strange is the 0x10 Pancake router address worked on the last contract i tested on testnet...

Rishabh3321/dApp_boilerplate: React Truffle Web3js Boilerplate using Context Api.
https://github.com/Rishabh3321/dApp_boilerplate