Etherscan status shows REVERTED.

but with no ERROR MESSAGE.

while the contract has error message in every require statement.

Can a transaction REVERT in such a way. What are the other reasons that might exist.?

You might want to console out intermediary results beyond the requirement statements.

The error is occurring at one specific Function which only has require statements initially and then a simple loop.

Moreover, all the require statements already have error messages.

So. Can there be any specific reason behind REVERTED status with no error MESSAGE.

REVERTED happens only because of some contract error right?

@SimonTianPhD @Lauri_P

Various code errors, such as divide by zero

In your case, I'd guess you loop over an item slot which doesn't exist

Right, Require statements do not do every checking.

Why do I get this warning in Remix when the code returns no warning or error in hardhat?

Add that comment, spdx thing in double quotes, also change ur compiler version in test.sol

Hey @Lauri_P .

I am starting to think this is the case.

So the loop that is there is this Function, starts from 0 and ends to 1. And for every loop safeMint Function of erc721 is called.

Could this be an issue.? @Lauri_P @SimonTianPhD

@BeingOptimus They are there, but Remix somehow ignores them.

from 0 to 1?

Then nvm, u can still deploy in remix with those warnings ;)

@BeingOptimus It does not compile. The magical part is, if a certain chunk of code is deleted, the warning is gone. That means, the warning has nothing to do with the literal meaning of it.

Lol ,might be the issue with compiler, which version of solc r u using?

any internal transactions? errors can happen under the hood

All I get is this. Without any ERROR message. While the contract has error messages in all the reuqire statement.

Just wana know the possible reasons for such revert.

Not necessarily an error with the contract code right. I want to know what other errors are possible? @SimonTianPhD

@SimonTianPhD

man, it would be a lot easier if you can share that chunk of code here.

texting you @SimonTianPhD

Known issue with online remix. Try changing http/https or removing some files from localstorage

you can compile anyway

oh, not with this warning.

This is like a super warning.

No compile is allowed.

Yeah its a big issue

Sometimes if you switch between contracts, the entire code will disappear

Good to know it's not just me!

For a while, I thought I was hacked or something.

like the guys from remix team tele-deleted the code.

strange I can compile anyway

why dont u test by making it unlicensed for a while?

I don't know. I ended up making a mapping public and having its getter removed. Boom, the warning is gone.

That error has nothing to do with license or version

Removing some code will help

But that too is temporary. It will come again

address

mapping (uint => uint)

All you need is a function that takes new router address and creates new pair on its factory

In latest compiler code?

What does that mean?

can't use mappings

need it to list all keys

Compatibility

If you need all keys, then huge array is the only option I think. Or if you can think of storing the keys seperately and sorted, that might be more efficient.

That wouldn't be an issue until the newly deployed router has same interface for the functions you use in your own contract